CANVS Corporation v Lockheed Martin, aka How Sausage is Made.

Behold with your own ears the epic battle between the Smallest Defense Contractor in the World and the Largest Defense Contractor Ever!

This is the mpeg audio file of my deposition in support of CANVS Corporation v Lockheed Martin, if you like bad spy novels, conspiracy theories, and a dystopian view of the present then you are in for a treat! I give you Parts 1 through 9.  

Part 1 of 9

Part 2 of 9
Part 3 of 9
Part 4 of 9
Part 5 of 9
Part 6 of 9
Part 7 of 9
Part 8 of 9
Part 9 of 9

Below is the top ten list of institutional shareholders in Lockheed Martin. Now your shareholders know.

• SSgA Funds Management, Inc.
• The Vanguard Group, Inc.
• Black Rock Fund Advisors.
• Capital Research Management Company.
• Geode Capital Management LLC.
• Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC.
• Wellington Management Company LLP.
• Capital Research Company.

Bullied the wrong guy this time...

"Of all the things the President of Lockheed Martin could have said, that Lockheed Martin and its President, and I quote, "never heard of Mr. Walkenstein or CANVS Corporation" is the most arrogant, deranged, and insulting untruth they could have said about me.

News flash, CANVS won CANVS v USA

http://canvs-v-usa.blogspot.com/2013/10/unclassified-top-ten-list.html

I was the Army Night Vision and Electro-Optics program manager with Lockheed as subcontractor to CANVS on what become The Arrowhead Program.

We (CANVS Corporation) have signed NDA's and a signed contract with Lockheed Martin.

You do not have to pay child support if you did not build the baby I spent my entire life designing, why are you so afraid of a DNA test, oh yeah we don't need Jerry Springer to know that, I am the Father!

- Mr. Walkenstein

#MrWalkenstein
#CANVS
#AbuseofVeteranOwnedSmallBusiness
#MarillynAHewson
#JamesDTaicletJr
#LockheedMartin

Look beyond the makeup...

https://www.whistleblowerattorneys.com/blog/lockheed-martin-settlement-unlikely-last/

"Look behind the makeup..."

- Mr. Walkenstein 

#MrWalkenstein 

#MarillynAHewson 

#LockheedMartin 

10 Days in Virginia

2,624 pages, ten days of trial. Want to read something that will make your blood boil as an American? This is the unholy offspring of a Tom Clancy Spy Thriller, with a John Grisham Conspiracy and a Terry Gilliam Monty Python episode.

Enjoy :CANVS v SOCOM

Note: Tuesday 14 July, 2020 The Air Force asked me to remove this transcript link. 1st Amendment isn't what it used to be folks.

John 8:32

CANVS Corporation v. Secretary of the Air Force Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Case #: 0:19-bcaag-01190 Case Filed: Nov 09, 2018

So this went to the Director of The FBI, each member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and to The President.

"You have now!"

Enjoy!:

Dear Director Wray:

I am writing this letter to inform you that Department of Justice Civil Division Branch Attorneys threatened my witnesses and tampered with evidence in direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1512 (witness tampering) and 25 CFR 11.440 (Tampering with and fabricating evidence).

I reported these activities in a letter dated Thursday 03MAY18 to: Michael E. Horowitz

U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 4706

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

These violations occurred during an ongoing contract dispute case, CANVS V SOCOM that was previously in front of The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals but is currently being appealed by CANVS to the Federal Circuit Court:

CANVS Corporation

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Case numbers 57784, 57987

Under Contract No. USZA22-03-C-0027 Currently renamed to:

CANVS Corporation v. Secretary of the Air Force Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Case #: 0:19-bcaag-01190 Case Filed: Nov 09, 2018

I am appalled at the numerous criminal and Constitutional violations that my Company, my friends and I have been subjected to during this battle that has been ongoing since 2005.

Mr. Michael E. Horowitz, The Department of Justice Inspector General, The DOJIG forwarded my DOJ IG complaint to the Civil Branch (the very same individuals that I was reporting for criminal behavior) and told me to take it up with Mr. Joseph H. Hunt Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Civil Division. I do not believe that the DOJIG responded appropriately and my response was to file a GAO complaint against the DOJIG, and send you this letter.

I have so far been unable to make an appointment with Mr. Hunt to discuss this matter face to face, if you can help me make an appointment to meet Mr. Hunt that would be appreciated.

CANVS has previous extensive experience with The Department of Justice: http://canvs-v-usa.blogspot.com/2016/09/16-years-in-making.html

I have four questions for you to which I am requesting direct and actionable answers to:

1. Who do I present my evidence to that proves that Department of Justice Civil Division Branch Attorneys threatened my witnesses and tampered with evidence in direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1512 (witness tampering) and 25 CFR 11.440 (Tampering with and fabricating evidence)?
   
   
2. Who is responsible for enforcement of 18 U.S. Code § 1512 and 25 CFR 11.440 violations?
   
   
3. Here are two examples of US Government employees wrongfully calling me a liar in the public domain (for the record, I do not take kindly to being called a liar).
   
   
   http://canvs-v-usa.blogspot.com/2018/03/canvs-neglects-to-highlight-that-first.html
   
   
   http://canvs-v-usa.blogspot.com/2018/12/liable-and-slander-are-words-i-am.html
   
   
   Here is an example of a Federal Judge Threatening me in front of a room full of witnesses: http://canvs-v-usa.blogspot.com/2018/03/i-think-you-should-take-penny-on-dollar.html
   And here is some information that documents that US Government representatives tampered with a critical piece of evidence in CANVS V SOCOM:
   
   
   http://canvs-v-usa.blogspot.com/2016/01/sabotaged.html
   
   
   In all of the above instances CANVS has volumes of evidence that comprehensively documents every aspect of the Un-Constitutional behavior of US Government representatives. Over One Terabyte of evidence was turned over by me to Federal Authorities so far.
   
   
   My question to you is: What is my legal recourse in these matters (does this behavior raise to the level that Government employees can be sued for Liable and Slander and Tortious interference of business)?
   
   
4. Can you suggest that The Senate Judiciary Committee call me and my colleagues in to talk with them on this matter?

This highly inappropriate behavior must be stopped and those who ordered and carried out these atrocities against me must be held responsible for their actions. I swore an oath when I was sworn in as a US Army Aviation Warrant Officer to uphold and defend The Constitution against all threats both foreign and domestic, this oath has no expatriation date. If you believe, like me, that Government employees threatening witnesses and tampering with evidence in a Federal Court Case is a clear example of a domestic threat to our Constitution then I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter, do not let this gross miscarriage of justice

stand.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Alexander Walkenstein President, CANVS Corporation

Honorably discharged US Army Aviation Warrant Officer,

Veteran Small Business Owner, and proud Citizen of these United States.

CC Members of The Senate Judiciary Committee:

Senator Lindsey Graham 290 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-5972 Fax: (202) 224-3808	Senator Dianne Feinstein 331 Hart Senate Office Bldg. Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone:(202) 224-3841 Fax: (202) 228-3954 TTY/TDD: (202) 224-2501
Senator Chuck Grassley 135 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone: (202) 224-3744 Fax: (202) 224-6020	Senator Patrick Leahy 437 Russell Senate Bldg. United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-4242
Senator John Cornyn 517 Hart Senate Office Bldg. Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-2934	Senator Dick Durbin 711 Hart Senate Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone: (202) 224-2152 Fax: (202) 228-0400 TTY: (202) 224-8180
Senator Michael S. Lee 361A Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone: 202-224-5444	Senator Sheldon Whitehouse Hart Senate Office Bldg., Rm. 530 Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-2921 Fax: (202) 228-6362
Senator Ted Cruz 404 Russell Senate Office Bldg. Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-5922	Senator Amy Klobuchar 425 Dirksen Senate Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-3244 Fax: (202) 228-2186
Senator Ben Sasse 136 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-4224	Senator Christopher A. Coons 127A Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone:(202) 224-5042

Senator Joshua D. Hawley B40A Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-6154	Senator Richard Blumenthal 706 Hart Senate Office Bldg. Washington, DC, 20510 Phone: (202) 224-2823 Fax: (202) 224-9673
Senator Thom Tillis 185 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-6342 Fax: (202) 228-2563	Senator Mazie Hirono 713 Hart Senate Office Bldg. Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-6361 Fax: (202) 224-2126
Senator Joni Ernst 111 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-3254 Fax: (202) 224-9369	Senator Cory Booker 359 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-3224 Fax: (202) 224-8378
Senator Mike Crapo 239 Dirksen Senate Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-6142 Fax: (202) 228-1375	Senator Kamala Harris 12 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone (202) 224 - 3553 Fax (202) 224 - 2200
Senator John Kennedy SR 383, Russell Senate Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-4623	Senator Marsha Blackburn B40B Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: 202-224-3344 Fax: 202-228-0566

Did you get that thing I sent you?!

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PEACOCK:

Quote:

"185. Mr. Walkenstein testified that he is aware of only one entity that has manufactured color night vision goggles using different color phosphors in different optical channels since 2005. According to Mr. Walkenstein, that entity is the Russian government or a manufacturer having a relationship with the Russian government. (Tr. 3/82-83; GPF ¶ 982) CANVS has produced no technical details or other substantiating evidence regarding this alleged Russian manufacturer of a night vision goggle having different color phosphors in different optical channels. There is no documentary proof in the record relating to this alleged Russian night vision goggle. CANVS has produced no evidence to indicate that this alleged Russian manufacturer had gleaned the information concerning color night vision goggles from the APBI Poster. (Tr. 3/83-84; GPF ¶¶ 983-84)"

When someone lies about you it is never OK. It is even more egregious when that someone is acting of behalf of The US Government.

Quote:

"we have relied to a considerable extent on the government’s proposed findings in our Findings of Fact herein."

What that means is they just adopted the SOCOM lawyers position rather than looking at the evidence. This behavior is criminal it is called "material misrepresentation of material facts in evidence in a case". Furthermore, when material misrepresentation of facts occurs with the intent to deprive someone of what is rightfully theirs, I believe it is a felony.

The following materials were in evidence in this case at the ASBCA as early as January 25th, 2013:

Not only is this a heinous miscarriage of justice, it is just not OK to do this to ANY AMERICAN, especially this American who not only understands his Constitutional Rights, but also swore an oath to protect The Constitution against all threats both foreign and domestic...

 

And now this from The US DOJ IG!

So if you remember back a few posts (dear-dod-ig) I sent a letter asking The Inspector General of The Department of Justice for a meeting to deliver evidence of  felonious activities carried out by US Department of Justice and US Air Force Judge Advocate General employees. This is his response:

So I ask for help with illegal activities carried out by The Commercial Litigation Branch of The Department of Justice from the Department of Justice Inspector General and he tells me to take it up with The Commercial Litigation Branch. This is like getting mugged by a police officer and then getting up and reporting the mugging to the very same officer. My response to this is in process...