Thursday, March 6, 2014

5 to represent over 1,000,000 (less than 0.0005% of the facts)?

1000 sheets of 8.5 x 11 printer paper is roughly 10 pounds.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_density

Since I submitted around 170,000 pages of hard copy evidence in CANVS V USA, that makes for 1,700 pounds of hard copy evidence (probably weighed over one tonne when you count the page protectors, notebooks, post it notes, and boxes).

We are not even going to address my testimony to Congress, the video tapes, DVDs, and digital video footage based evidence.

In addition to the hard copy evidence I have over one million soft copy documents. Please note I did not say one million pages, I said documents. Because the file types vary (pdf, Word, XL, PowerPoint, E-Mail, Images, code, and others) and span two decades of computer hardware and software I have never had reason to do a hard page count.

Let us look at the minimum of 1,000,000 pages, if it was all printed out, the soft copy would weigh at least 10,000 pounds. If it were ten pages per document (which is probably closer to the true count) it would weigh 100,000 pounds.

It should also be noted that as of yet the CANVS discovery process (in CANVS V USA) has been stayed for over 3 years, meaning I have yet to see one page of the materials that I have requested from the Government (God only knows how much evidence they have hiding in all the various Agencies, Labs, and other classified nooks and crannies of the system I have tangled with over all these years).

What I am getting at is that with all the information associated with this case, and all of the materials that can not be released into the public domain because it is restricted under protective order by the court, is or was classified, is or was proprietary, is or was confidential, I find it astounding that the official Government sanctioned and released information about this case totals the FIVE (5) Documents below!


http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/CAMPBELL-sMITH.CANVS121313A.pdf
10-540C CANVS CORPORATION V. THE UNITED STATES
Filed 12/13/2013

Patents; Summary Judgment; Anticipation Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) (2006); Obviousness Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103; Expert Testimony Signed by Judge Campbell-Smith.

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/HEWITT.CANVS041613.pdf
10-540C CANVS CORPORATION V. THE UNITED STATES
Filed 04/16/2013

Motion to Reconsider Order of Dismissal of Patent Claims for Failure to Prosecute; RCFC 41(b); Motion to Reconsider Denied Signed by Judge Hewitt.

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/HEWITT.CANVS102512.pdf
10-540C CANVS CORPORATION V. THE UNITED STATES
Filed 10/25/2012

Patent Claim; Insufficiency of Claim Chart; No “Timely Showing of Good Cause”; Denying Motion to Amend Claim Chart; Denying Reconsideration Under Rule 54(b); Dismissal of Claims Under Rule 41(b) Signed by Judge Hewitt.

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/HEWITT.CANVS072312.pdf
10-540C CANVS CORPORATION V. THE UNITED STATES
Filed 07/23/2012

Insufficiency of Claim Construction Chart and Claim Construction Statement; Order for Briefing on Amendment of a Claim Chart; Order for Briefing on “a Timely Showing of Good Cause”; Order for Revised Expert Report and Claim Construction Statement Signed by Judge Hewitt.

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/HEWITT.CANVS042312.pdf
10-540C CANVS CORPORATION V. THE UNITED STATES
Filed 04/23/2012

Availability of Sanctions Under RCFC 16(f); Untimely Filings Under the Court’s Rules and Orders; Expense Shifting Under RCFC 37(a)(5); Government Entitled to Reasonable Expenses Including Attorney’s Fees Signed by Judge Hewitt.



I must say for the record, if one were to draw any conclusions based only on these documents, ones opinion of the goings on in this case would be so severely warped as to render any truth contained in these documents as completely irrelevant.

I guess the only way that this story is going to be told is for me to submit the Book and Movie Script to be cleared for public release.

1 comment:

  1. 91, 94, 173, 241. These are the days between published decisions...I hope this is not indicative of a trend.

    ReplyDelete