Total Pageviews

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied...


The following is from notes related to The Nuremberg Trials:

The Trial of the Major War Criminals began on November 20, 1945; British judge Sir Goeffrey Lawrence called the court to order, saying that "This trial, which is now about to begin, is unique in the annals of jurisprudence." The trial ended on October 1, 1946.

That means that it only took 315 days to try, convict, and sentence the entire Nazi high command.

Please note that my Patent infringement case against the US Government was filed on 10AUG10. As today is 25NOV12, that is 838 days SO FAR and we still do not have a date set for the first day actually in court. There is something very wrong in Denmark!

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Meet the DOJ team...

This is the legal team representing the Defendant in CANVS V USA.

From Left to Right:
  • John A. Hudalla
    Attorney

  • Stuart F. Delery
    Acting Assistant Attorney General

  • John Fargo Director Commercial Litigation Branch
    Civil Division United States Department
    of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant.

  • Lindsay K. Eastman, Attorney
    United States Department of Justice of counsel.
Please note that everything above and including this sentence is a presentation of factual information with no commentary or opinion.

The following is opinion and commentary:
  • Walter Cronkite would be proud.

  • I thought you as Taxpayers might be interested in seeing who the Government is Paying to represent "USA" in this case.

Federal Law Schmedral Law...

In case you fail to understand the significance of this document:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2012/m-12-19.pdf

Let me break it down for you.

The President is worried about having over 100,000 Americans laid off right before the election. Federal Law clearly states what needs to be done, the OMB at the direction of the President, has told the largest Defense Contractors in America not to worry go ahead and break the law and if you incur any costs associated with breaking the law the Taxpayers will pick up the tab. The way this was done is an affront to "Taxation without Representation". Once again Small Business is given a boot to the face and kicked to the curb as Government takes Big Business to lunch on the taxpayers dime!

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/329106/taxpayers-could-face-billions-legal-costs-due-administration-asking-lockheed-martin-re

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/02/republicans-rip-white-house-for-putting-tax-dollars-on-line-over-possible/

Friday, September 14, 2012

Size brown shoes don't fit...


In the aftermath of the publishing of the book "No Easy Day" a number of folks in this administration have made some claims about policing up the release of sensitive materials. Sorry I had to stop there for a minute as I was laughing so hard milk shot out of my nose.

While I am in the process of writing a letter to SECDEF, I thought I would post something as my Blogging activities have been nonexistent for a while. The reason for this is that I have to consider an number of things before I put photons on this screen. What considerations you might ask:

  • Is the material Classified?
  • Is the material Sensitive?
  • Is the material ITAR Restricted
  • Is the material covered by Nondisclosure or Confidentiality Agreements?
  • Is the material covered by a US Federal Court Protective Order?
  • Is the material something that your mother would approve of?

While I sort these things out in preparation of continuing this blog as well as writing my book (I am sure a bunch of people at various agencies just did the "spit take" if they were drinking coffee...) in the mean time let me share two real fire extinguisher stories with you!

I was responsible for moving an entire research department from one facility to another back in 1990. The new facility was awesome, but like any new buildings it had some kinks to work out, little things like water leaking onto high voltage panels, and a fire alarm that would arbitrarily decide to go off.

I closed down the laboratory that I was responsible for (my title was Research Analyst III but I built and ran all the hardware in the facility) in 2009. For 19 years the fire alarm was never fixed. The problem was a sensor in an elevator. With the hot and humid weather here in south Florida when the humidity was high enough and the elevator doors were open long enough in the air conditioned hallways when it got to the ground floor the sensor fogged up and the alarm would go off. I kid you not this had to have happened hundreds of times in the 19 years I was there. It was not uncommon for me to work 24, 48, or 72 hours at a time and invariably I was there when the alarm would go off. EVERY TIME I would grab a fire extinguisher and head for the alarm panel, whip out my cell phone and call it in. I would stay on the phone as I confirmed there was no fire, temporarily reset the system and call out the maintenance crew to investigate.

I kept pointing out the "Boy That Cried Wolf" syndrome to everyone that would listen, the alarm goes off, no one cares because of all the false alarms, if there is a real emergency precious time will be lost because everyone will assume all is well just reset the system. One day I am in the lab and the alarm goes off. I pick up a fire extinguisher and head to the alarm panel phone in hand. This time I smell smoke, fortunately I had a key for the door where the smoke was coming from, I open the door (after putting my hand on the metal door to see if it is hot) and there on top of a wooden crate is a pile of newspapers clearly intentionally set ablaze! It couldn't have been lit for more than 60 seconds I must have just missed the arsonist(the door to the "secure" storage area was often left open while people came and went so they wouldn't need to check out a key, same for the "secure" hallway door to the parking lot always left open). I pointed the fire extinguisher at the base of the fire and pulled the trigger. The fire was out but it was so hot it was looking like the top of the wooden crate could re-light. So I ran back to the lab to get a second fire extinguisher (my eyes were killing me at this point, the smoke was bad but the powdered irritant in the fire extinguisher was worse). Fire truck was on the way at this point as I was on the phone with them the entire time.

As I emerge from the lab and head out into the parking lot to go back to the hallway door that led to the door to the storage room (I had propped the storage room door open at this point) I am reaching for the handle of the hallway door as I am confronted by a local law enforcement officer on a Segway. He looks me straight in the eyes and says "You can't go into the building there is a fire!" I had to keep from laughing (he was only doing what the manual says)...without stopping I held up the fire extinguisher with one hand and pointed to it with my other hand and said "We can talk after I put out the fire". Bill Engvall moment "Here's your sign..."

This second fire extinguisher story took place in the University of Miami dorms in 1984. I am in my room studying for a Calculus II test and I smell smoke (NO ALARM), I head out into the hallway (in those days you were allowed to smoke in your room if my memory serves correctly) I see the dude at the end of the hall he is clearly stoned or drunk or both, his room door is open and he is just standing there in front of one of those small metal round trashcans and there is a pillar of fire shooting out of it that is literally taller than he is. I grab a piece of wood (it was a length of 4x4 left over from the loft I built) and smashed the glass between me and the fire extinguisher, run down the hall and extinguish the fire. The dude in the room say "Dude that was crazy!". Just as I am walking back to my room the Resident Assistant in charge of the floor (his name was Bernard) comes running after me screaming...you can't make this kind of thing up...he says to me, "Why the hell did you break the glass?!" Here's your sign...

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Sausage and Appropriations....


I found the paper written by S. Peter Worden, "ON SELF-LICKING ICE CREAM CONES" please note his position at the time of the presentation. He is currently the Director of NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif.

I am still working on an updated treatise on the subject with specific focus on U.S. Military Night Vision Procurement perhaps called: "SELF-LICKING ICE CREAM CONES IN THE DARK".

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Excuse me Senator, I think you dropped this...



As our representative form of government continues to wipe their asses with our Flag and Constitution in plain view of anyone that actually looks at what is really happening in this country, I had hoped that there would have been a bit more backlash from "We The People...".

Let me see if I get this right, a law was passed that had a fine in it if a citizen didn't do what the law said. The Supreme Court says House and Senate can't do that BUT it would be OK if it were a tax. Can someone explain to me why the law is not invalidated and the House and Senate forced to now vote on the exact same bill but with the word TAX replacing the word penalty, or fine?

If you have not figured this out yet it has nothing to do with providing anyone with anything. I take that back, they will be providing criminal elements access to an extremely large Government mandated revenue stream. Last time I checked Social Security isn't working too well. Here is how I know it is all a crock, if the members of the House and Senate were serious about providing healthcare that really worked for the entire country, then they should all be willing to trade in their gold plated existing policies for the lowest coverage afforded by the proposed system (Perhaps they would also return all the money they have stolen from Tax payers as well...).

A good friend of mine once told me that it is easy to know when you are in Washington DC, as you are shaking someones hand they pull out a knife with the other hand and stab you in the chest, meaning they don't wait to stab you in the back, and it is done shamelessly in plain sight.

The Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves, I am almost glad they are not here to see what is being done to the beautiful concept and vision they had. On the other hand if they were here I think there would be some good old fashioned Andrew Jackson style ass kickings!

Monday, June 18, 2012

Dear Jon Letter from The Inspector General Department of Defense


In case you missed it, this is flawlessly executed buck-passing at the highest level. The DODIG responds to me, this allows them to claim they took action and have fulfilled their legal responsibility, and they hand it off to "appropriate authorities within the Department of Defense". Ass covering and hand washing while simultaneously passing the buck, an absolutely text book hall of fame worthy buck passing performance!


The "appropriate authorities within the Department of Defense" carrying out "action they deem appropriate".